Page tree

Date

Attendees

Goals

  • First meeting of the academic year

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes

Review ChargeMPH

Charge: To develop, implement, and review collection development and acquisitions policies, procedures and budget for all of the Library's collections in all formats to assure balance and equity.


CommunicationMPH

MPH proposed a new way of communicating through confluence/infocentral.  A Library area has been set up with a sub-folder for this committee.  It will serve as a repository for agendas, meeting minutes, etc.   Accounts have been created for all librarians. If you have not received one, please let MPH know.


ERAC updatesMPH
    • MLA is now contracted exclusively with EBSCO.  An announcement can go out to relevant departments when HG get back.
    • OLS is looking at streaming video services including Kanopy and Films on Demand
    • WSJ stats show 3% of enrollment at BC are signed up. It is unclear from the report of WSJ use how many are faculty, students, staff, etc.

STEMMPH

STEM initiative is up for renewal and there will likely be changes in the package and how costs are allocated. MPH will be part of a group discussing this, organized by OLS.


Selection ToolsMPH

Selection Tools - We agreed to try using OASIS (COUTTS).  We’ll have a future working meeting of the CD committee to take a look at it.  Accounts will be created (GC)


Policy on what we take from book donors (Len Fox estate)JW

We need to discuss our criteria for saying yes or no for accepting large collections, especially when it is books from a former faculty member or other community member.

Discussion will be held and Policy and procedures will be developed (MPH)

Policy on how we handle donors or funds for collections (Andrew Garoogian estate)JW

Agreed that procedures will be drafted by MPH.

MPH suggested a standing agenda item to discuss monograph ordering progress and challenges.


Future initiatives, projects (what would you like this committee to be?)

ALL

A desire for more transparency, particularly in terms of decision-making regarding renewals/cancellations.

A project to review our subscriptions in order to plan our cancellations was suggested. Related to this was a request for more information on which licensed electronic resources are being used in OERs (and by other classes).

A recent article on libraries exiting "big deals" was discussed. We talked about possibly analyzing our own deals to see if we would be better off going title-by-title in some cases.

Mary pointed out that we need to be careful with cancellations because, in addition to the OER/class use concern, there are also some resources that are essential for program accreditation.

Action items

  • Ask ProQuest to create Oasis accounts for bibliographers. Graciela Canada
  • Draft policy and procedures for accepting/declining donations, as well as procedures for working with donors. Michael Hughes
  • Draft procedures/guidelines for timely expenditure of gift funds. Michael Hughes
  • Ask Miriam Deutch  to talk about OER needs re: electronic resources at a future meeting. Michael Hughes